Friday, November 2, 2012

Behold the Starlings...


Around this time every year the starlings who roost at the West Pier dance in chorus above what remains of the pier. I don't know why they do it or for how many days or weeks this happens, but it is one of those things that you keep forgetting about. Then, when you see it, you can't quite take your eye off this dazzling show of shapes and formation flying. Why? How do they know how and where to go without poking each others eyes out with their beaks. The velocity they pick up is quite high as well, it is any wonder they do not career and smash into the ground or the pier.

I'm no ornithologist, but there's clearly some kind of law written into the nature of the starlings. They do as they have been commanded and it brings God great glory. The individual starling, bless it, is nothing particularly wonderous aside from some interesting markings. As birds go, the starling is nice, but its no sparrow, robin or bird of individual beauty. But when they do this thing that starlings do in concert, it really is something quite spectacular and glorious.

So it is, then, that we see a glimpse in nature of what things could be like in Holy Mother Church. The starlings are obedient to something, let us call it God, but also something written into their nature. They're also under this unseen vow of obedience to each other. Each and every starling is required for this dance and they just don't seem to go off and 'do their own thing' when they are performing it. There is this joyful union of wills going on. They are united in the preaching of a higher order, something beyond themselves. Together they form this awesome team that can create spectacular shapes in the sky. They tell of a truth that is greater than themselves and far more important than themselves. There is a beautiful surrendering of will by the starlings which speaks of conforming to a law or will beyond their own, even if this law is written into their being.

Dr Tina Beattie
Onto Tina Beattie, then. Tina, let us learn from the starlings the beauty of surrendering our wills and opinions to something greater than ourselves - the Magisterium of our Holy Mother the Church. For we, as Catholics, preach not ourselves and our misguided opinions, but the beauty of the Divine law, as given to us by Our Lord Jesus Christ, to love and serve the Lord our God with all our minds, hearts and strength and understanding, and our neighbour as ourselves.

No Catholic should expect to be given a platform at a Catholic institution if they consistently and unapologetically misrepresent and scandalously lead astray Catholics as to the truth given by Christ to the Apostles and revealed to the Church by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. We are erring, the Church cannot err in faith and morals. Let us have the humility to surrender our will, our minds and our hearts to the teaching that comes not from the minds of men or women but from God Himself. The Church's teaching on abortion, artificial contraception and homosexuality and frankly, everything concerning morality, is written into our nature so that all men and all women, with reason could discover it. The Church's teaching on abortion, artificial contraception and homosexuality is proclaimed by Her as the Divine institution that She is, infallibly, by the Successor of St Peter, who guards the Deposit of Faith, and in obedience to whom, the Apostles teach and preach the Gospel.

If one of those starlings were to do their own dance on their own, out of concert with the rest of the starlings, then not only do they take away from the beauty of the starlings' dance, but they would begin to look a little bit silly. Right now, Tina is that starling. It is really very necessary that we pray for Tina Beattie. The only person that Tina has to blame for her recent cancellations of lectures in Bristol and beyond is herself, because she is not speaking or writing in concert with the Catholic Church. You are doing your own dance, Tina - your own thing and you consistently oppose the Magisterium publicly in your writings. This is documented very well by Protect the Pope. Perhaps, you could instill confidence into Catholic institutions by publicly retracting some of these outlandish and frankly blasphemous views. Similarly, were the Church to be a Gregorian Chant choir, it is really no good one choir member singing something totally different and totally secular, instead of the Dies Irae.

If you take the model which is Tina Beattie, along with the other 'spirit of Vatican II' types now adorning The Tablet's pages week in, week out, as well as those who are on the 'lecture circuit', the grave danger is that these people who encourage the flock to 'do and believe your own thing' are actually listened to and given so much attention that in the end, there is no beautiful murmuration of starlings anymore. There is no dance anymore, there is no formation in concert anymore. There is no Church anymore. That is why the Bishops Conference of England and Wales, who Dr Beattie is astonishingly encouraging to join in her rebellion, need to tell her that enough is enough and that they, as leaders of the flock, will put up with her 'do/believe your own thing' message no longer. Tina, you may be a dissident theologian, but Martin Luther you are not.

St Thomas Aquinas: A theologian
For Catholic institutions to remove a platform from Catholics who dissent from the Church's teaching publicly is not to foster the 'Sovietization' of the Catholic Church. It is to defend those in their care from error and for the institution to define itself as definitely Catholic, in concert with the Pope and Bishops. May I remind Tina and all who support her at what is a difficult time for her public image, that Soviet Russia did not believe in Divine Revelation, did not stand for anything to do with the Catholic Faith and, indeed, arrested, tortured and killed those who were loyal to Christ, His teaching and His Church. What an insult Tina's statement is to those men and women in the Soviet bloc who died for the teachings of Christ and His Church!

On reflection, Tina would, I expect, have fared rather well in Soviet Russia since she seemingly takes every opportunity she can to undermine and subvert the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church. A theologian who pays no attention or has no regard for the Magisterium of the Church, no interest in Holy Tradition, no appreciation for what Christ, the Evangelists and the Fathers of the Church actually say on Salvation and truth is a theologian no more but a philosopher. The day Dr Beattie tells us to burn all her books because they are 'mere straw' will be the day that I rejoice for Dr Beattie, because if her books are anything like what I've read on her blog and in The Tablet, they are indeed perfect for your rabbit hutch. That's just my personal opinion, of course, you may think the same of what I write.

However, if Dr Beattie wants to preach the 'do your own thing, believe your own thing' message then she can do so in her own time and none can stop her from her freedom of speech. Let us not forget, though, that freedom of speech does not come without consequences and people remember what we say. Surely it does not give any Catholic the licence or the right to be given a platform at any Catholic institution if the content of their message gives scandal or leads souls astray because it is out of concert with the Pope and the Bishops.

It is the duty of all Bishops to defend the flock from those who seek to pick them off or lead them away from the Good Shepherd. If you have not already done so, consider writing to the Papal Nuncio, because anybody calling the Shepherds of the flock of the Catholic Church to rebel against the Magisterium and the Pope needs whatever Catholic platform she is being given with which to lead the flock astray to be removed for her good and the good of the whole Church, now.

See also: Fr Ray Blake, The Catechesis of Caroline, Protect the Pope, The Muniment Room

Blasphemy at The National Gallery

An exhibition of the paintings of the late Richard Hamilton called 'The Late Works' is currently open at The National Gallery and is due to run until January 13th.

Hamilton was well known (as opposed to famous) for his everyday scenes invariably featuring naked women.

This is the Fra Angelico version


One of his works depicts the Annunciation scene and is known as 'The passage of the angel to the virgin'.

It is a perversion of the Fra Angelico painting of this holy scene but, Hamilton's version shows the Mother of God naked.

The Christian Faith is often used as a soft target for playwrights and artists (and galleries) who, in creating shock waves also enhance the value of their work and gain valuable publicity.

I am weary of stating that they would not dare to undertake a comparable project featuring the mother of the prophet or a venerable Sikh leader. But, it's true; these people are gutless and one can only pray for their conversion or redemption.

But - we can also complain.

You may reach The National Gallery here.......nicholas.penny@nationalgallery.co.uk 

and the group who are campaigning for this painting to be removed are known as Friends of Our Lady (I know them not but they have suggested an email format that is conveniently cut and pasteable). I have amended it slightly as I do not think that over the top 'outrage' type comments receive attention necessarily.

Dr Nicholas Penny is the Gallery Director

Here it is:

 Dear Dr Penny,

I would like to protest against the exhibition 'The Late Works'
of Richard Hamilton. I am specifically protesting against the painting 'The passage of the angel to the virgin'.

 This painting distorts, in an unimaginable way, the sacred scene of The Annunciation as painted by Fra
 Angelico.
To most Christians it is a blasphemy against the Mother of God.

It mocks and belittles my Christian religious beliefs, as well as the Christian
 roots of this country.

I would ask that this painting be removed immediately from the exposition.
 And I will do my utmost to ask as many people as possible to send in
 their protests too.

 Yours faithfully,

[Your Name]



Blog Problems


For my sins, I have been using Google Chrome as a web browser. Currently, every time I try to visit my blog site the message above greets me. I'm just wondering whether readers are able to gain easy access to my blog or they get a similar message to the one above. You can 'proceed anyway', but as far as I know visiting my site is perfectly safe, and this message might put people off rather!

Thursday, November 1, 2012

Sponsors consider pulling out but Bigot Ceremony goes ahead

If you have the time, the inclination and the money (just £155 will do it) you will just be in time to turn up at the Victoria & Albert Museum (no, really) for the Stonewall Bigot Awards of 2012.

Quite sweet really, the dress requirement is simply listed as 'Cocktail' (no pun intended).

It all kicks off with champers and canapes at 6.45pm before well known (ahem) Television personality, Gok Wan (I love those good old Irish names) starts giving out the Awards.

As the organisers describe it:


Taking place in the magnificent Raphael Gallery of the Victoria & Albert Museum, this year’s Awards exemplify the individuals and organisations which are critical in ensuring a positive representation of gay people in the media today, one of Stonewall’s key priorities.

Guests will enjoy a champagne and canapĂ© reception before moving through for the presentation, hosted by Gok Wan. Winners in ten categories will include Politician of the Year and Entertainer of the Year and will be voted on by our panel of judges – Broadcaster Alice Arnold; Channel 4 News Culture Editor Matthew Cain; England rugby star Ben Cohen; Author Val McDermid and UK Black Pride MD Phyll Opoku-Gyimah. 
The evening continues until 10.30pm with more champagne, food and entertainment.

There is one category of award that is causing two of the sponsoring companies some angst; it's The Bigot of the Year Award (I thought those were the organisers).
Two banks, Barclays and Coutts have received a lot of comment from Christian customers (how dare they?) complaining about this rather unsavoury award category (the whole caboodle is pretty unsavoury if you ask me).

                             The winner of the Gigot of the Year Award

As a result I believe that they have now withdrawn or thinking of withdrawing from this sad little event.

Good! Well done those who complained and well done Coutts and Barclays, watch out for some pretty nasty foot stamping.

Of course, the main object of Stonewall's ire is our own dear Scottish Cardinal O'Brien. God bless him and protect him from the hissy fits.

I see that there is also a Journalist of the Year Award but to my utter dismay and shock, I cannot see Damian Thompson's nomination anywhere.

It must have gone astray in the post.

Litaniae Sanctorum


Ora pro nobis!

Happy Feast of All Saints.

Our Dearly Beloved NHS

Here in Britain, we pay out Government taxes so that when we are old and grey and no longer working, the Government can pay NHS hospitals to have us killed by dehydration and starvation against our wishes and those of family and friends.

We also pay the Government taxes so that the same NHS can refer our family and friends for abortions so that our unborn children will be killed off. According to official statistics, there were just over 700,000 live births in England and Wales in 2010. The fact that there were 190,000 abortions indicates that over one in five pregnancies were 'terminated'.

We also pay our Government taxes, so that the same NHS can temporarily sterilize our young daughters of 13 without our knowledge or consent, because the NHS obviously believes that despite being a serial killer of the unborn and the elderly sick, it merits the awesome responsibility to be a parent to our children.

Exactly, what will it take to have British people on the streets with very large placards outside Parliament in great numbers, exercising their democratic right to protest?


Google just doesn't get it

Today, November 1st, is All Saints Day.

A day celebrated by the vast majority of Christian denominations.
That means, without any exaggeration, that many millions of people worldwide, will hold today as being very special.

If they are Catholic they are bound to attend Holy Mass to fulfil their obligation.

So what do Google feature today on their web page?

                                              Lowry's 'Matchstick Saints'

A painting by J.S. Lowry who was born on November 1st 1887.

Great. Lowry aficionados must be enthralled, all eight of them (after all he is the most overrated artist of the past 100 years).
 I cannot understand why anyone would wish to have one of his paintings on their wall.

But the bigger picture is that Google is snubbing Christianity; it seems to be searching for any old alternative theme rather than feature anything remotely connected with Christ.

Have you ever seen a Google featuring the crucified Christ at Easter? Or a depiction of the risen Christ on Ascension Day?

No?

Well, watch out for robins on logs and horse drawn coaches this Christmas.