CAFOD

Do You Remember Voting for This Guy?

International financial rapist of nation states tells UK Prime Minister what to do on Europe.

Soros has helped to fund:

Campaign for 'gay marriage', LGBT movement
Pro-Euthanasia campaigns
Campaign for legalisation of all drugs
Abortion
Artificial contraception and much, much more...

If Cameron is taking orders from Soros, Cameron needs to be arrested for treason.

We voted for corrupt politicians. Not corrupt billionaires in New York. He has a sense of irony, though. His mega-foundation is called 'Open Society'.

Wilde

There are men in the World and even Catholic Church today who consider themselves to be modern day Oscar Wildes.

Most of them forget that not only was Wilde married to a woman who he loved (and with whom he had children), but was repentant over his 'gay lifestyle' when he was received into the Catholic Church on his death bed.

Since his conversion at any other time would have caused scandal to the Faithful, were he unrepentant, he would not have been received.

Marriage Morning Must Read

Courtesy of The Telegraph

'The Education Secretary issued formal reassurances that teachers and other staff who hold traditional views on marriage should not be punished for refusing to promote same-sex marriage at work.

 But a senior source in Mr Gove's department said the UK was not “in control” and that the ultimate decision might “inevitably” be taken at the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg.

 It comes as the Coalition prepares to publish a bill to allow same-sex couples to marry. David Cameron believes that gay marriage is a fundamental issue of equality and is determined to make it law.

But he is facing a backlash from within his own party and churches who believe it would undermine the institution of marriage by redefining it.'

Click here for full article. As often as you can, pray for the defeat of this 'proposal'.

To read the Same-Sex Marriage Bill 2012-2013, click here.

Without the enemy within

Father Simon Henry has an excellent post on Offerimus Tibi Domine that encapsulates beautifully, the main issue facing the Catholic Church today, that of the enemy within.

Those who in OTD's words: hate the Church as it has manifested itself for hundreds of years, certainly hate the Pope, hate Rome and hate the Tradition which has been the vehicle of transmitting the Faith and the Scriptures down the generations.

And Father Ray Blake makes the same approach from a different aspect HERE.

It set me thinking as to what our Catholic lives would be like if we did not have that element of the demonic. 

What difference would it make to our Faith, our spirituality, to be free of Bishops who persecuted any of their priests who showed a desire to celebrate the old rite of Mass, or priests who advocated abortion and same sex "marriage" or laity who were not spiteful in their attitude towards anything that smacked of reverence?

I think that I can give a fairly accurate assessment as to what life would be like without the enemy within, here is a broad brush picture:-

1. Mass Ad Orientum - in every church

2. The Tridentine Latin Mass available in every parish on Sundays and Holydays of Obligation

3. Benediction, Plainchant, May Processions and more in every parish

4. Reception of Holy Communion only by kneeling and mouth

5. Catholic Education with integrity and rigour

6. Head on conflict with the State over Adoption, Abortion, Same Sex "Marriage" and more

7. Seminary intakes up dramatically

8. A return of those who have "left" the Faith

9. An increase in Baptisms and Church weddings

10. Full churches

Child Abuse

In the absence of natural parentage, it is child abuse to deny a child the right to a father and a mother. It is to neglect a child's welfare and best interests. Children require and deserve paternal love and a male role model as well as maternal love and role model for their personal development in order to grow up with a healthy attitude towards love and relationships. To adopt or 'buy' children in order to fulfill the personal desire of the adopter, rather than the needs of a child for a loving mother and father figure, is to turn the child into a product or a commodity.

Westminster: The seat of abused power

A Government that enshrines onto statute legislation that seeks to undermine or destroy those adoption charities who truly seek the welfare of children to be served, rather than the personal desires of potential adopters is a Government that no longer shows care or concern towards its young citizens, nor the institutions of marriage and the family that bind the society together.

A Government that deliberately legislates to penalise those who seek the best interests of children to be served is a Government worthy only of the scorn and contempt of its population. Such a Government has lost all legitimacy. Such a Government should be removed, since if it cannot be trusted to care for the welfare of children, it cannot be trusted to protect or defend the welfare or interests of any of its citizens.

De-Classified

It is worthy of note that the last time in human history the Government classified people along the lines of their sexuality, a great many homosexuals ended up getting exterminated by the Government, along with people classified according to their job, political affiliation and religion. They couldn't have done it without the help of IBM, of course.

Thank God that IBM - as an information technology company with reams of information on nearly everyone and with ongoing contracts with every kind of Government department around the globe - are no longer a force to be reckoned with. Such a company, I suppose, would in modern times have the ability to be something of an 'all-seeing eye'. Thankfully we've left that terrible period of history long behind. Oh, no wait...

I suppose that as long as Government is at the service of people, rather than people at the service of the State, IBM are a force for good 'service delivery' in the World. The problem seems to be that history tells us they don't mind doing business with Government when the State sees at least a proportion of its own citizens as expendable or in some way unhelpful to the Government's 'agenda'.

Do people really think that the absurdly powerful movers in this World, The Royal Society - along with those eugenicists at work within it - see homosexual persons as persons with an innate dignity that comes from being made in the image and likeness of God? Exactly where do homosexuals and lesbians fit in with the Human Genome Project? Are the rights of homosexuals, lesbians, bisexuals and transgendered people really cared for by Government and industry, or will all who sign up to this social engineering project and to being 'classified' be viewed in history as 'useful idiots'?

People must surely realise that the goal of the eugenicists at work in powerful groups in Government and industry is for total State control over human reproduction.

This can only be achieved by the complete destruction of marriage and the complete severing in the public consciousness of the link between sexual intercourse and procreation. Did not the brother of Julian Huxley, Aldous, warn us of what was to come if we did not wake up? 


If people at the top of the most powerful institutions around the World are basically Nazi in their outlook, are not homosexuals and lesbians going to be among the first groups to be lined up against the wall once the takeover of all of society is complete?

Call me a conspiracy theorist if you wish, but it seems obvious to me that the UK Government holds its own citizens in contempt. A Government that presides over the deliberate killing of its unborn citizens and of its elderly can in no way be relied upon to defend the rights of those in between these stages of life. What makes people so convinced it really cares for 'gay rights' when, in the grassroots gay community itself, there is such little call for 'gay marriage'? Can we be absolutely sure that what is 'down the road' is not just persecution of the Church, but the gas chambers for those who refuse to bow down to State-dictated morality and State-led tyranny?

If, as is regularly seen in Parliament, the people are ruled by a band of thieves and robbers, if Government is happy to kill its unborn and elderly citizens already, if Government lies to its people consistently and lies about its motives for 'foreign excursions', then in what way is the State trustworthy to deliver any service to the people that does not deserve the utmost scrutiny?

In what sense can we, as citizens of this country, accept a Government that sees itself as so powerful and so beyond the reach of natural justice that it believes a human institution such as marriage belongs to it and that the same Government can alter its inherent meaning, purpose and definition. Any society that allows its Government that kind of totalitarian power, knowing well the real possibility of the criminalization of those who disagree with its actions that will follow in the wake of its legislation, is a society that is literally asking for the terrible history of the 20th century to repeat itself in the 21st.

You might say that you can't imagine Cameron and Clegg endorsing anything seen in the 20th century (anything, that is, short of endorsing the killing of the unborn as a 'human right'). Fine. I would quite agree. However, what if we currently have, in the United Kingdom, not simply a State, but a State within the State in which Government personnel simply come and go? The way policy is developed and forced on the people today, without real reference to public opinion, along with the way in which public opinion is manipulated with the power of propaganda, it is not impossible that this is the State in which we now live.