The 'new consensus' on gay 'civil rights' is becoming more and more distasteful. Again it is an imposition upon the people of the UK, rather than a law which has widespread public approval or appeal. It all reminds me of a committee meeting in which there are several dissenters.
The Chair of the meeting says, "Right, so on gay adoption we are all agreed."
One man raises his voice and says, "I don't agree with this."
The Chair says, "In conclusion then, we are all agreed."
A woman says, "I'm not sure about this. Is this really in the best interest of a child?"
The Chair says, "So, we are all agreed, then."
Another man says, "In all truth, this is a scandal! I cannot accept this!"
The Chair says, "Meeting closed. Good. We are all agreed. Secretary, don't worry about the minutes. I'll handle that."
Courtesy of The Telegraph
The woman, who cannot be named for legal reasons, has told friends she is worried about the environment in which her son will grow up in, and would rather see him fostered by a man and a woman.
The child, who attends a faith school and is due to take his First Communion soon, is due to arrive tomorrow at his new foster home, a hotel in Brighton run by a middle-aged male couple. Described as "bright and lively", he was placed in care a year ago by Brighton and Hove Council after his mother had a mental breakdown, suffering from an abusive marriage.The Thomas More Legal Centre, a Catholic legal charity, are representing the mother, who wants to see him placed with a family that reflects traditional Catholic values. Neil Addison, director of the centre, said: "We are advising her on her legal options and seeking to resolve the matter with the council by agreement
Apparently, a spokesman for the Council declined to comment, saying: "We will not comment on any issue relating to the welfare of a child in the care of the council." Read, there is to be no debate on the welfare of a child in the care of the council.
No comments:
Post a Comment